
Use a level-score example
Imagine Player A has 60 and Player B 67 before A legally pots the ordinary final black for seven. The scores become 67–67 in this fictional example. That equality creates a different case from a final black leaving one side ahead.
The actual rule includes conditions about whether aggregate scores are relevant. Use the event’s scoring form and official decision rather than assuming every level-looking table follows the same procedure. The example concerns the ordinary frames-won context.
The re-spot has its own start
WPBSA’s rule describes spotting the black, selection of who plays next and play from in-hand. It is a new deciding sequence within the frame’s result process, not another full fifteen-red frame.
Do not restore all earlier balls or reset the scorecard to zero. The level ordinary totals remain the context. A short replay showing only the re-spot can be a complete deciding-sequence video while not containing the whole frame.
The next pot or infringement matters
The rule specifies the deciding consequence after the re-spot. A foul can therefore end the frame without the black being potted. A video ending with the black still visible is not automatically missing the winning shot.
Use the official referee’s decision for the actual incident. A difficult escape attempt or cue-ball outcome may be decisive under the rules, while a crowd reaction alone cannot tell you what was called.
In a fictional best-of 17 match tied 8–8 before the decider, the re-spotted-black outcome can settle both that frame and the match. In an earlier frame, the same procedure may change only the frame tally. The ball’s appearance alone does not identify that larger consequence; the prior match score does.
Keep frame and match outcomes labelled
A re-spotted black can settle one frame or, if that frame is decisive, the match. It is not automatically a new match or a universal tournament tie-break. The prior frame tally establishes the larger consequence.
For an archive note, record tournament, round, players, frame score and match frame tally. This article uses current WPBSA rules and original 60/67 arithmetic. It does not judge an unseen foul, predict results, establish Canadian rights or claim IPTV Canada access. No playback was tested.
Related questions
Does a re-spotted black necessarily cancel the earlier pot?
No. It can follow a legitimate pot that made the scores equal.
Must the deciding black always be potted to end the frame?
The cited rule also provides a consequence for an infringement.
Sources and scope
Scope notes distinguish published documentation, supplied information and editorial methods. They do not report a hands-on service test.
- WPBSArulebookSection3 Rule4 — Levelblack exception respot procedure andnextpot/infringement
- WPBSAcurrentruleshub — Versionstatus
