Treat the 2021 request as a request
The official news-agency report records José Ramos Horta asking RTTL to promote Tetum, Portuguese, Indonesian and English in news. Preserve the speaker, date and proposal wording. Do not rewrite an aspiration as a completed current programme feature or a universal multilingual menu.
If a household needs one of those languages, seek the actual programme and edition. An old proposal can explain the discovery task without establishing a present schedule, caption option or full archive. Keep an unverified language requirement visible rather than filling the gap with a promise.
Keep agency text and broadcaster recording distinct
TATOLI is a news-agency publisher, while the report identifies RTTL as the radio-and-television organization. A TATOLI article about an interview is not automatically the original recording. Preserve the host of the item you actually found and the source it describes.
A translated agency report can help a reader understand a topic without supplying a translated television soundtrack. For a complete discussion, retain the programme family, guest and edition date and inspect the actual recording. If only the report exists, identify it as a report.
Use the original language title and format
Copy a Tetumor Portuguese title from the publisher and keep any official alternate title separately. A household translation is useful context but should not become a guessed catalogue identifier. Similar titles across language pages can be parallel reports rather than identical video editions.
Retain whether the intended object is radio, television, an agency article or a public event. A radio discussion with artwork may be complete audio. A short television extract can omit context present in the longer conversation.
Use Dili’s dated reference and current evidence
For a verified live appointment, use Asia/Dili with the actual programme date and the Canadian city. Keep the Timorese edition date for replays, separating it from an agency article’s later publication timestamp.
Direct RTTL player retrieval and Canadian playback were not verified in this research. Check the current official item for language, captions and permission. The primary source establishes a historical four-language request and agency publishing context, not a four-track entitlement, current device feature or commercial IPTV lineup.
Related questions
Does the 2021 four-language request prove four tracks on every RTTL video?
No. It is a reported proposal. Verify the actual current programme and language edition.
Is an English TATOLI article the same as an English RTTL recording?
No. Agency text and broadcaster programme are separate objects.
Sources and scope
Scope notes distinguish published documentation, supplied information and editorial methods. They do not report a hands-on service test.
- TATOLI —11 May 2021 RTTL language request — Official agency record of a four-language proposal, explicitly not current delivery proof.
- TATOLI — editorial-language navigation — Observed Tetum/Indonesian/Portuguese/English agency editions, not television audio tracks.
